2021年12月13日 — Performance of NFS and SMB in the case of sequential reading is similar when using plain texts. But with encryption, NFS is slightly ahead of ...
2015年6月20日 — Once a connection is established, SMB has less overhead than NFS. However, SMB is more or less a Microsoft protocol. To get the best performance ...
2021年3月15日 — In the case of sequential read, the performance of NFS and SMB are almost the same when using plain text. However, with encryption, NFS is ...
2023年4月26日 — NFS is known for its fast performance and low overhead, while SMB is known for its reliability and compatibility. The choice between NFS is ...
2019年3月25日 — NFS vs Samba - what's the trend nowadays? · NFS is fast and easy to setup, and uses Linux rights which is pretty straightforward. · SMB/CIFS is a ...
2019年8月27日 — On small random accesses NFS is the clear winner, even with encryption enabled very good. SMB almost the same, but only without encryption.
2023年1月18日 — NFS is faster than SMB when using encryption. Reading transactions are faster in SMB with the 4-MB rate. High traffic loads can slow down the ...